Build an experience-based recruitment path
Recruit consented participants who recently faced the situation under study.
- Preparation
- Preparation plus an outreach round
- Difficulty
- Moderate
- Task
- Recruit relevant interview participants
Before you start
Get what you need before you start
- Confirm the approved contact route, consent wording, retention period, and incentive policy.
- Create participant codes and keep contact details in the approved contact system.
Steps
Work through the method
Use the listed inputs and tools. Check the evidence when you need to verify a step.
Define the target experience
Describe the recent situation a participant must have faced and the details that would disqualify them.
Why it matters: Actual or likely users must match the research need.
- Input
- The research question.
- Output
- Inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Tools in this stepGoogle SheetsEvidence for this step
GOV.UK guidance recommends recruiting actual or likely users and selecting a route that fits the research need.
GOV.UK Service Manual: Choosing the best approaches to find participants; Inviting existing users
Write the screener
Turn the criteria into short factual questions that do not reveal the preferred answer.
Why it matters: A screener should distinguish relevant experience without coaching a response.
- Input
- The inclusion and exclusion criteria.
- Output
- A reviewed screening form or script.
Tools in this stepGoogle FormsGoogle SheetsEvidence for this step
GOV.UK guidance recommends recruiting actual or likely users and selecting a route that fits the research need.
GOV.UK Service Manual: Choosing the best approaches to find participants; Inviting existing usersA practitioner advises replacing leading solution questions with neutral questions about behaviour and context.
First Round Review: Collect better data by checking your bias
Choose the recruitment route
Select an approved route that reaches likely users and record its coverage limits.
Why it matters: The route affects who can enter the sample.
- Input
- The participant definition and available channels.
- Output
- A route with its selection limits.
Tools in this stepGoogle SheetsEvidence for this step
GOV.UK guidance recommends recruiting actual or likely users and selecting a route that fits the research need.
GOV.UK Service Manual: Choosing the best approaches to find participants; Inviting existing usersOne anonymous founder reported weak replies to manual and automated outreach while product work was paused.
Hacker News: Root post by anonfounder747, 3 February 2022
Send the invitation
State the research purpose, session format, data use, incentive, and voluntary consent before booking.
Why it matters: Participants need enough information to choose whether to take part.
- Input
- Approved invitation and consent wording.
- Output
- Invitations sent through the approved route.
Tools in this stepGoogle SheetsEvidence for this step
GOV.UK guidance recommends recruiting actual or likely users and selecting a route that fits the research need.
GOV.UK Service Manual: Choosing the best approaches to find participants; Inviting existing users
Screen consistently
Apply the same criteria to each response and store only a participant code in the evidence register.
Why it matters: Consistent screening keeps the sample tied to the research question.
- Input
- Screening responses.
- Output
- An eligibility decision with a criterion trace.
Tools in this stepGoogle SheetsEvidence for this step
GOV.UK guidance recommends recruiting actual or likely users and selecting a route that fits the research need.
GOV.UK Service Manual: Choosing the best approaches to find participants; Inviting existing users
Check the recruited mix
Compare booked participant codes with the experience criteria and record missing perspectives.
Why it matters: A booked group can still omit relevant variation.
- Input
- The coded booking list.
- Output
- A sample review and remaining recruitment gap.
Tools in this stepGoogle SheetsEvidence for this step
GOV.UK guidance recommends recruiting actual or likely users and selecting a route that fits the research need.
GOV.UK Service Manual: Choosing the best approaches to find participants; Inviting existing users
Success checks
Check the result before you finish
- Every participant meets the recent-experience criteria.
- Consent and session details were sent before booking.
- The evidence register contains participant codes instead of direct identifiers.
Failure modes
Watch for these problems
- Stop outreach that lacks an approved legal basis.
- Change the route when it repeatedly reaches convenient insiders.
- Report response and sample limits without turning them into general benchmarks.
Tools
Choose the tools you need
Tool
Google Forms
A form for collecting consented screening answers or short accounts of a customer’s recent experience.
Check fit, limits and pricingTool
Google Sheets
A shared spreadsheet for source-linked research, decisions, and operating records that people can inspect and correct.
Check fit, limits and pricingSources
Read the sources behind this practice
Check what each source supports and where the advice has limits.
- Hacker News: Ask HN: How best to get early feedback from users?First-hand community discussion · Published 3 February 2022
- First Round Review: How to Know if Your Idea's the Right OneEdited practitioner interview · Publication date unavailable
- GOV.UK Service Manual: Finding participants for user researchGovernment service guidance · Publication date unavailable
- Google Workspace: Google Forms: Online Form BuilderOfficial product page · Publication date unavailable
- Google Docs Editors Help: Publish & share your form with respondersOfficial product documentation · Publication date unavailable
- Google Docs Editors Help: View & manage form responsesOfficial product documentation · Publication date unavailable
- Google Workspace: Collaborative, AI-powered spreadsheetsOfficial product page · Publication date unavailable